Perspectivas da litigância climática em face de empresas: o caso Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
BECK, Ulrich. Sociedade de Risco: rumo a uma outra modernidade. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2010.
BODANSKI, Daniel. RAJAMANI, Lavanya. The Evolution and Governance Architecture of the United Nations Climate Change Regime. In.: Global Climate Policy: Actors, Concepts, and Enduring Challenges. Coord. Urs Luterbacher, Detlef F. Sprinz Regim. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2018.
CARBON DISCLOSURE PROJECT (CDP). The Carbon Majors Database. 2017. Disponível em: https://b8f65cb373b1b7b15feb-c70d8ead6ced550b4d987d7c03fcdd1d.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/cms/reports/documents/000/002/327/original/Carbon-Majors-Report-2017.pdf; Acesso em 29 de jul de 2021.
COSTELLO, Anthony; ABBAS, Mustafa; ALLEN, Adriana; et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet. 2009; 373: 1693-1733
COX, Roger. A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2016, 34:2, 143-163, DOI: 10.1080/02646811.2016.1147887
FERREIRA, Heline Sivini. A dimensão ambiental da teoria da sociedade de risco. In: FERREIRA, Heline Sivini; FREITAS, Cinthia Obladen de Almendra (orgs.). Direito Socioambiental e Sustentabilidade: Estados, Sociedades e Meio Ambiente. Curitiba: Letra da Lei, 2016.
FRANCE. LOI n° 2017-399 du 27 mars 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d'ordre. Disponível em: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000034290626; Acesso em 10 de jul de 2021.
IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Nueva York, Cambridge university Press, 2007.
KINLEY, David; TADAKI, Junko. From talk to walk: the emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 44, n. 4, p. 931-1023, 2004.
LIN, Jolene. Climate Change and the courts. Legal Studies, Vol. 32 No. 1, March 2012, pp. 35–57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00206.x
Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell, 26-05-2021, (C/09/571932 / HA ZA 19-379). Disponível em: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5339&showbutton=true; Acesso em 23 de jul de 2021.
MILIEUDEFENSIE. Noticeletter Shell. Subject: liability for inadequate climate policy. Disponível em: https://en.milieudefensie.nl/news/noticeletter-shell.pdf; Acesso em 23 de jan de 2021.
MILIEUDEFENSIE. Reaction Shell. Milieudefensie zet klimaatzaak tegen Shell door. Disponível em: https://milieudefensie.nl/actueel/milieudefensie-start-definitief-klimaatzaak-tegen-shell; Acesso em 23 de jan de 2021.
OLIVEIRA, Mónica. FERREIRA, Marisa Roris. LIMA, Vanda. Responsabilidade Social Corporativa: Conceito, Instrumentos De Gestão e Normas. Revista Brasileira de Administração Científica, Aquidabã, v.6, n.2, Jul, Ago, Set, Out, Nov, Dez 2015.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS (ONU). Comissão de Direitos Humanos. Resolução n. n. 41/21 de 2019. Los derechos humanos y el cambio climático. A/HRC/RES/41/21.
ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA A COOPERAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÓMICOS (OCDE). Linhas Diretrizes da OCDE para as Empresas Multinacionais. 2000. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/38110590.pdf; Acesso em 20 de jul de 2021.
ROYAL DUCH SHELL (RDS). Shell confirms decision to appeal court ruling in Netherlands climate case. Disponível em: https://www.shell.com/media/news-and-media-releases/2021/shell-confirms-decision-to-appeal-court-ruling-in-netherlands-climate-case.html; Acesso em 23 de jan de 2021.
RUGGIE, John Gerard. Apenas negócios. São Paulo: Planeta sustentável, 2014.
SETZER, Joana. HIGHAM, Catherine. Global trends in climate change litigation: 2021 snapshot. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2021.
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. Disponível em: https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf; Acesso em 10 de jul de 2021.
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Key Messages on Human Rights and Climate Change. Disponível em: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/ClimateChange/keyMessages_on_HR_CC.pdf; Acesso em 23 de jul de 2021.
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Paris Agreement. 2015. Disponível em: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf; Acesso em 23 de jan de 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Global Compact. Disponível em: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/; Acesso em 10 de jul de 2021.
Urgenda Foundation v. State of the Netherlands, Eerste aanleg, 09-10-2018 (ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196). Disponível em: http://climatecasechart.com/climate-change-litigation/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/non-us-case-documents/2018/20181009_2015-HAZA-C0900456689_decision-4.pdf; Acesso em 23 de jan de 2021.
Véase Kelderluik-arrest, HR 5 november 1965, NJ 1966, 136 (ECLI:NL:HR:1965: AB7079). Disponível em: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:1965:AB7079; Acesso em 23 de jan de 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v19i1.7949
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)