Legal response to protection of right to communicate & appropriate adults during process of arrest or detention
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cap Ed & Jawaid Luqmani, Defending Suspects at Police Station (Legal Action Group, 3rd ed,
.
Daniel Wilsher, Article 6 Right to liberty, ed. Steve peers, Tamara Hervey, Jeff Kenner & other,
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (hart publishing, USA & Canada 2014).
Dixon David, Bottomley Keith, Coleman Clive, Gill Martin and Wall David, “Safeguarding the
Rights of Suspects in Police Custody” (1990) Policing and Society.
Drakeford, M.,`The Appropriate Adult', Probation Journal (1994),
(3).
European Commission, “Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on certain Procedural Rights
in Criminal Proceedings throughout the European Union”, Brussels 28 April 2004.
Fenwick Helen, Civil Liberties and Human Rights (4th ed., 2007, Routledge -Cavendish
Publish).
Zander Michael, Cases and Materials on the English Legal System (10th ed., 2007, Cambridge
University Press).
Louise, Appropriate Practice? A study of the Role and Co-ordination of Volunteer Appropriate
Adult for Young Suspects, papers submitted to the University of Plymouth, September
Malcolm Evans & Rod Morgan, Preventing Torture (1st Ed, 1998, Clarendon Press.
Oxford).
Taru Spronken & Marelle Attinger, Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Existing Level of
Safeguards in the European Union (July 28, 2009). European Commission, December
, Available at SSRN: .
Walinets, S. `You're on duty and you get a call from the police... ', Social Work Today, 30th
September (1985).
Clem Henricson & Andrew Bainham, the human rights obligations and policy supporting children
and families, at accessed 10 March 2021.
Nacro, Proportionality in the Youth Justice System, p. 5 at: accessed 10
March 2021.
Marcus Morgan, 7 October 2020 accessed 14
September 2020.
Amnesty International Europe and Central Asia program director, time to end incommunicado
detention in Spain, at: .
The Declaration of the Principle of Detention Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly
on December 9, 1988.
Otamendi v Spain, App no 47303/08 (ECtHR, Judgment 16 October 2012).
T. v United Kingdom, ECtHR, 16 December 1999, (no. 24724/94).
C. v United Kingdom, ECtHR 5 June 2004, (no. 60958/00).
R v Palmer, the time September 1991. R v Morse [1991] Crime LR. 195.
Mc Veigh, O ‘Neil and Evans v UK, 18 March 1982.
DPP v Blake [1989] 1 WLR 432.
The police & Criminal Evidence Act, (PACE) s.56 (1).
Code of Practice, Code C para. 3.1.
Code of Practice, Code C para. 5.1.
Code of Practice, Code C para. 5.4.
Code of Practice, Code C para 5.5.
Code C, annex B, para.1 and 2 (Code C, para 5.6).
Code C para 5.7.
Code C Note for Guidance 5A.
Code C para. 5.7A.
Code C para. 3.9.
Code C para. 1.7(a). the CDA s. 65(7).
Code C Note for Guidance 1C.
Code C Note for Guidance 1 C; Code C Note for Guidance 1 D; Code D Note for Guidance 1 A.
Code C Notes for Guidance 1F; Code D Note for Guidance ID.
Code C para 11.14.
Code C para 3.12.
Code C para 11.6.
Code C para. 3.11.
Code C para. 10.6.
Code D paras. 1.13; 1.14.
Code C para. 16.1.
Code C, para. 1.4
Code C para. 1.7(b) and Code D para. 1.6(b).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v19i2.8370
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)