Discourse on online transportation under Posner's theory: a comparative analysis in Indonesia and Brazil

Sapto Hermawan, Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma

Abstract


Legal gaps cause rejection and conflict in the international transportation industry, primarily regarding online services. This research focuses on how legal regulations in Brazil and Indonesia can accommodate global businesses such as Uber and other online transportation platforms. This research analysis uses qualitative methods accompanied by comparative and theoretical approaches. For this reason, Posner's Theory of Economic Analysis of Law notices that actors have different strategies to maximize their opportunity costs. Therefore, the legal protection covering international companies such as Uber can differ in each country. This action is based on the rational choice of business actors to obtain legal protection, which is influenced by: (a) the law of demand, (b) opportunity cost, and (c) the free flow of resources. This article's result demonstrates that Indonesia and Brazil have potential markets for digital transportation. Still, every country must settle social friction toward shifting digital civilization through strong and adaptive regulation.

Resumo
As lacunas legais causam rejeição e conflito no setor de transporte internacional, principalmente em relação aos serviços online. Esta pesquisa se concentra em como as regulamentações legais no Brasil e na Indonésia podem acomodar negócios globais como Uber e outras plataformas de transporte online. Esta análise de pesquisa utiliza métodos qualitativos, acompanhados de abordagens comparativas e teóricas. Por isso, a Teoria da Análise Econômica do Direito de Posner percebe que os atores possuem estratégias diferentes para maximizar seus custos de oportunidade. Portanto, a proteção legal que abrange empresas internacionais como a Uber pode diferir em cada país. Essa ação baseia-se na escolha racional dos atores empresariais para obter proteção legal, que é influenciada: (a) pela lei da demanda, (b) pelo custo de oportunidade e (c) pelo livre fluxo de recursos. O resultado deste artigo demonstra que a Indonésia e o Brasil possuem um mercado potencial para o transporte digital. Ainda assim, todos os países devem resolver o atrito social em direção à mudança da civilização digital por meio de uma regulamentação forte e adaptável.

Keywords


: international business, digital transportation, sharing economy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


AFIFAH KUSUMADARA. Kedudukan Hukum sebagai Alat Pembangunan ekonomi di Era Reformasi. Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan, v. 40, n. 3, p. 364–389, 2010.

AGUS RIYANTO. Economic Analysis of Law terhadap Kejahatan Korporasi. Binus University: Faculty of Humanities. Disponível em: .

ALESSIO DI AMATO. Uber and the Sharing Economy. The Italian Law Journal, v. 2, n. 1, p. 177–190, 2016.

ARIF Z. DJUNAEDI. Digitalization Impact on Growth & Human Capital: Indonesia Broadband Plan Case Study. Review of Business, Accounting & Finance, v. 1, n. 3, p. 299–309, 2021.

BARRETO, Yuri; SILVEIRA NETO, Raul da Mota; CARAZZA, Luis. Uber and traffic safety: Evidence from Brazilian cities. Journal of Urban Economics, v. 123, p. 103347, 2021.

DELPHINE AURÉLIE LAURENCE DEFOSSEZ. The Regulation of a Project of the Deregulation: UBER in Brazil and the European Union. Journal of Law and Regulation, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1–28, 2017.

DIAN MANDAYANI ANANDA NASUTION. Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Layanan Transaksi dan Transportasi Berbasis Aplikasi Online. RESAM Jurnal Hukum, v. 4, n. 1, p. 17–30, 2018.

DON TAPSCOTT; DAVID AGNEW. Governance inthe Digital Economy. 1999. Disponível em: .

EDILENICE PASSOS. Doing Legal Research in Brazil. Hauser Global Law School Program. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 jul. 2022.

FRANCESCO DE MASI. The Uber Case: A Ride for the Future of The European Single Market. LUISS, Italy, 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 jul. 2022.

GARY MINDA. The Lawyer- Economist at Chicago: Richard A. Posner and the Economic Analysis of Law. Ohio State Law Journal, v. 39, n. 1, p. 439–475, 1978.

GÖRÖG, Georgina. The Definitions of Sharing Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Management, p. 175–189, 2018.

GUIDO NOTO LA DIEGA. Uber Law and Awareness by Design. An Empirical Study on Online Platforms and Dehumanised Negotiations. European Journal of Consumer Law – Revue Européenne de Droit de la Consommation, v. 2016, n. 2, p. 383–413, 2016.

HADDAD, Eduardo Amaral; VIEIRA, Renato Schwambach; JACOB, Miguel Stevanato; et al. A Socioeconomic Analysis of Ride-hailing Emergence and Expansion in São Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, v. 1, 2019. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 5 jul. 2022.

HYUN J. KIM; CHAN S. SUH. Spreading The Sharing Economy: Institutional Conditions for The International Diffusion of Uber, 2010-2017. PLOS ONE, v. 16, n. 3, p. 1–14, 2021.

LEWIS KORNHAUSER. The Economical Analysis of Law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponível em: .

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA. Connected Indonesia: more digital, more advanced. Jakarta: Ministry of Communications and Informatics of The Republic of Indonesia, 2020. (Annual Report of The Ministry of Communications and Informatics od 2020).

MOHAMAD YASIR FAUZI; VIVI PURNAMASARI. Pendekatan Analysis Economic of Law Posner terhadap Konsep Wasiat Wajibah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Beda Agama. ASAS, v. 12, n. 2, 2020.

MURNI. Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Pasal- Pasal Hukum Persaingan Usaha dalam Undang- Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. Arena Hukum, v. 6, n. 1, p. 21–30, 2012.

NUR HANDAYATI; GALUH LINTANG TASLIM; SATYAGRAHA SURYAAGUST. Pengangkutan Online ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, v. 3, n. 2, 2019.

RAFAEL A. F. ZANATTA; BEATRIZ KIRA. Regulation of Uber in São Paulo: From Conflict to Regulatory Experimentation. Forthcoming in the International Journal of Private Law, v. 9, n. 1/2, p. 1–12, 2018.

RICHARD POSNER. Economic Analysis of Law. third Edition. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, 1986.

ROBERT COOTER; THOMAS ULEN. Law & Economics. Sixth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc, 2011.

RODRIGO NAVARRO. Government Relation and Uber in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Relações Governamentais, v. 1, n. 1, p. 28–33, 2016.

ROHMAT ADI PRASETYO; RIRIS RISMAYANI. Studi Karakteristik dan Faktor- Faktor Downstream User Transportasi Online (Ride Sharing) di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Wacana Ekonomi, v. 18, n. 1, p. 34–45, 2018.

SOCIAL STATISTICS IBGE. Continuous PNAD ICT 2019: Internet reaches 82.7% Brazilian households. Agência IBGE Notícias. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 jul. 2022.

SOPHIE HARNAY; ALAIN MARCIANO. Posner, Economics and The Law: From “Law and Economics” to an Economic Analysis of Law. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, v. 31, n. 2, 2009.

THE GOVERNMENT OF BRAZIL. Brazil: Contry Profile. National Implementation of Agenda 21. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 jul. 2022.

TRINAS DEWI HARIYANA. Pengaturan Ritel di Indonesia ditinjau dari Perspektif Economic Analysis of Law. Uniska Law Review, v. 1, n. 2, 2020.

WORLD BANK. Indonesia Overview. The World Bank. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 jul. 2022.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v20i1.8753

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia