A Hermeneutical Analysis on the Recognition of China as a Market Economy After 2016

Alberto Amaral Júnior, Aline Pereira de Carvalho Heringer

Resumen


This article seeks to analyze the possibility of recognition of China as a market economy for purposes of antidumping investigations, especially in light of China's Protocol of Accession to the World Trade Organization (Protocol of Accession). It is assumed that with the extinction of Article 15(a)(ii) of the Protocol there shall be an automatic grant of market economy treatment to China from December 2016 on. In this article, we will analyze legal aspects and the debate over the possible interpretations of Article 15 of the Protocol of Accession, in view of China’s “sui generis” economical practices. In view of China’s relevant role and considering the economic dependence of WTO Members towards Chinese economy, this issue should be carefully evaluated by all interested WTO Members, most preferably within WTO Dispute Settlement Body.

Palabras clave


International trade law, World Trade Organization, Antidumping Agreement, market economy, China.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


AMARAL JR, Alberto. A solução de controvérsias na OMC. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

ANTIDUMPING regulation of the EU on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the european community, 1225/2009. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/april/ tradoc_146035.pdf.

ANTI-DUMPING investigations against China in Latin America. IBA Divisions Project, IBA Trade and Customs Law Committee and the IBA Latin American Regional Forum.

ÁRABE NETO, Abrão M; SARDELLI PANZINI, Fa­brizio. Consequências do reconhecimento da China como econo­mia de mercado. São Paulo: FUNCEX, 2011.

BAJONA, C; CHU, T. China’s WTO accession and its effect on State enterprise. Hawaii: East-West Center Working Pa­pers, 2004.

BAPTISTA, Luiz Olavo. Dumping e antidumping no Brasil In: AMARAL JR, Alberto. OMC e o comércio inter­nacional. São Paulo: Aduaneiras, 2002.

BARONE, Barbara. One year to go: the debate over China‘s market economy status (MES) heats up. 2015.

BROWNLIE, Ian. Principles of public international law. 5. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

CANADA - Term of Patent Protection (Canada - Pa­tents) (WT/DS170/R). Panel Report. Appellate Body Report DS170. 2000.

DASGUPTA, Dipak. China 2020: China enga­ged: integration with the global economy. Availa­ble at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/ en/656981468743976946/China-2020-China-engaged-integration-with-the-global-economy.

EC: definitive anti-dumping measures on certain iron or steel fasteners from China. Appellate Body Report. DS397:2011.

EU - Antidumping Measures on Biodiesel from Indo­nesia. Appelate Body Report DS480.

EU - Cost Adjustment Measures and Certain Antidum­ping Measures on Imports from Russia. DS474.

EU- Antidumping Measures on Biodisel from Argenti­na. Appellate Body Report DS473: 2016.

EUROPEAN communities v. United States, US - Trade Act, DS200, 7.22, 638, 2000.

EUROPEAN Communities v. Japan, Japan - Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, DS8, 1996.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Directorate-general for external policies. Policy department. Workshop: market economy status for China after 2016?. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ STUD/2016/535023/EXPO_STU(2016)535023_ EN.pdf.

FINGER, J. M. Antidumping: how it works and who gets hurt. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.

GAO, Henry. If you don’t believe in the 2012 myth, do you be­lieve in the 2016 myth? WTO and China. 2011. Disponível em: http://wtoandchina.blogspot.com/2011/11/if-you-dont-believe-in-2012-myth-do-you.html.

GRAAFSMA, F. Kumashova, E. China’s protocol of accession and the anti-dumping agreement: temporary derogation or permanent modification? Global Trade and Customs Journal, n. 4, p. 154–59, apr. 2014.

HUCK, Hermes Marcelo. Da guerra justa à guerra econômi­ca: uma revisão sobre o uso da força em direito interna­cional. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1996.

IANCHOVICHINA, E.; MARTIN, W. Impact of Chi­na’s accession to the World Trade Organization. The World Bank Economic Review, 2004.

INDONESIA - Certain Measures Affecting the Auto­mobile Industry (Indonesia - Auto). Panel Report. WT/ DS54; WT/DS55, WT/DS59, WT/DS64: 1994.

JAPAN v. Canada, Canada - certain measures affecting the automotive industry, DS139, 807, 2000.

KRUGMAN, Paul; OBSTFELD, Maurice. Economia in­ternacional: teoria e política. 6. ed. São Paulo: Pearson, 2009.

KRUGMAN, Paul; WELLS, Robin. Introdução à econo­mia. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2007.

MAVROIDS, Petros C., PALMETER, David. Dispu­te settlement in the World Trade Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MIRANDA, Jorge. Implementation of the shift in bur­den of proof approach to interpreting paragraph 15 of China’s protocol of accession. Global Trade and Custom Lae, v. 11, 2016.

NEERGAARD, Anders; AUERSPERGER MATIC, Andrej. Parecer legal do parlamento europeu. Disponível em: http://www.vieuws.eu/eutradeinsights/wp-content/ uploads/2015/10/Extract-of-EP-legal-opinion-on-market-economy-status-for-China.pdf.

O’CONNOR, Bernard. Market-economy status for China is not automatic. VoxEu, 2011. Disponível em http:// www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/7345.

O‘CONNOR, Bernard. The myth of China and market economy status in 2016. Available at: http://worldtra­delaw.typepad.com/files/oconnorresponse.pdf.

ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA A COOPERAÇÃO E DE­SENVOLVIMENTO ECONÓMICO. Working group on privatization and corporate governance of State ow­ned assets: occasional paper: State owned enterprises In China: reviewing the evidence, 2009.

PAUWELYN, Joost. “The WTO agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures as applied in the first three SPS disputes: EC – Hormones, Australia – Sal­mon and Japan – Varietals”. Journal of International Eco­nomic Law, v. 2, n. 4. 1999.

PETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich. How to promote the international rule of law? World Trade Organization Ap­pellate Review System. 1998.

POLOUEKTOV, Alexander. The non-market economy issue in international trade in the context of WTO accessions: report. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and De­velopment, 2002

POSNER, Theodore. A comment on interpreting pa­ragraph 15 of China’s protocol of accession by Jorge Miranda. Global Trade & Customs, 146, 2014.

RAO, Weijia. China’s market economy status under WTO antidumping laws after 2016. Tsinghua China Law Review, v. 5, 2013.

REEVES, Martin; HE, Davis. What China’s 13th Five Year Plan Means for Business. Harvard Business Review. 2015.

RICARDO, David. The principles of political economy and taxation. 3. ed. London: 1821.

RUESSMANN, L.; BECK, J. 2016 and the application of an NME methodology to Chinese producers in anti-dumping investigations. Global Trade and Customs Journal, v. 8, 2014.

SINCLAIR, Ian. The Vienna convention and the law of treaties. 2. ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.

SPADANO, Lucas. O tratamento da China como economia (não) de mercado após 2016. Em Observatório de Defe­sa Comercial da Confederação Nacional da Indústria (CNI). 2013.

STOLL, Peter-Tobias; SCHORKOPF, Frank. World economic order: world trade law. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

THORSTENSEN, Vera. China e EUA: de guerras cam­biais a guerras comerciais. São Paulo, 2010.

THORSTENSEN, Vera. OMC, as regras do comércio inter­nacional e a nova rodada de negociações multilaterais. 2. ed. São Paulo: Aduaneiras, 2005.

THORSTENSEN, Vera. Perfil da política e instrumentos de comércio internacional dos BIC´s: China, Índia e Brasil: projeto regulação do comércio global. Brasília: IPEA, 2011.

THORSTENSEN, Vera; JANK, Marcos S. O Brasil e os grandes temas do comércio internacional. São Paulo: Aduanei­ras, 2005.

THORSTENSEN, Vera; RAMOS, Daniel; MULLER, Carolina. O reconhecimento da China como economia de mercado: o dilema de 2016. Revista Brasileira de Comér­cio Exterior, ano 26, n. 112, jul./set. 2012.

TIETJE, Christian; NOWROT, Karsten. Myth or rea­lity? China’s market economy status under WTO anti-dumping law after 2016. Policy Papers on Transnational Economic Law, n. 34, Transnational economic law rese­arch center, 2011.

TRADE Policy Report. WTO secretariat report. Trade Policy Review Body. WTO. 2016.

TRADE Policy Review. Geneva: OMC, 2014.

TRADE Policy Review Body, WTO Secretariat, Trade Policy Review Body. WTO. 2016.

UNCTAD Report, UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/ MISC.20. 2002.

UNITED States – definitive anti-dumping and counter­vailing duties on certain products from China. Appella­te Body Report. DS379: 2011.

UNITED States - tax treatment for ‘foreign sales cor­porations’. Panel Report. DS108: 2000. UNITED STATES Trade representative. 2014 report to congress on China’s WTO compliance, 2014.

US GAMBLING, DS285, Panel Report. 2005.

US GASOLINE. Appelate body report. DS2:1996.

US GASOLINE, DS2, appelate body report, 1996, pa­rag. 16-17.

US: China bilateral WTO agreement, antidumping and subsidies methodology, Third WTO Ministerial Confe­rence, Seattle, Washington, 1999.

VAN DEN BOSSCHE, Peter. The law and policy of the world trade organization. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cam­bridge University Press, 2008.

WORKING Group for the Accession of China to the WTO. WT/ACC/CHN/49.

WORKING Group for the Accession of Vietnam to the WTO. WT/ACC/VNM/48:2007.

WTO REPORT. Geneva: WTO, 2010.

WTO REPORT. Geneva: WTO, 2012.

YFISLIN, Justin; CAI, Fang; LI, Zhou. The lessons of China’s transition to a market economy. Cato Journal, 1996.

YU, Yanning. Rethinking China’s market economy sta­tus in trade remedy disputes after 2016: concerns and challenges. Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, v. 8, 2013.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v15i1.5053

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia