The arbitrator Epitácio Pessoa and the Brazilian approach to arbitration: an analysis of the settlement of disputes between public entities and foreign investors

Henrique Lenon Farias Guedes, Marcilio Toscano Franca Filho

Resumen


Reiterated since the 1960s by consecutive yet ideologically different federal administrations, Brazilian resistance to international investor-State dispute resolution has been taken for granted in many arbitral circles, especially due to a perception that the Latin American country has adhered to Calvo and Drago Doctrines. This paper questions those assumptions as it analyzes neglected arbitral awards issued in 1916 and 1918 by famous internationalist Epitácio Pessoa, renowned jurist at the time and President of Brazil from 1919 to 1922, who settled disputes between public entities – the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro and the Brazilian Federal government, on the one side – and foreign investors, on the other side, on questions derived of tramway and railway concessions. This article unprecedentedly considers the awards as it investigates the legal bases over which Brazil has always had a different instance on arbitration than the other Latin American countries, aiming at contributing to understanding contemporary resistances to investor-State dispute settlement.

Palabras clave


Investment arbitration. Investor-State dispute settlement. Epitácio Pessoa. Calvo Doctrine. Drago Doctrine. Arbitration in Brazil.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


BLACKABY, Nigel; PAULSSON, Jan. Arbitration in Latin America: was Carlos Calvo misunderstood? In: VERÇOSA, Haroldo Malheiros Duclerc (Ed.). Aspectos da arbitragem institucional: 12 anos da Lei 9.307/1996. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2008, p. 341-351.

BLOUNT, Jeb. Brazil’s Petrobras must pay higher royalty in Whale Park dispute. Reuters, June 06, 2015. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/brazil-petrobras-royalties-idUSL1N0ZM2ED20150707. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BRAZIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. REsp 1636113/SP. June 13, 2017.

BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. SEC 5206-7, December 12, 2001.

BRAZIL. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/ConstituicaoCompilado.htm. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BRAZIL. Decree n° 5.452 (May 01, 1943). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/Del5452.htm. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BRAZIL. Law n° 6.404 (Dec. 15, 1976). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L6404consol.htm. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BRAZIL. Law n° 8.666 (Jun. 21, 1993). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8666cons.htm. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BRAZIL. Law n° 8.987 (Feb. 13, 1995). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L8987cons.htm. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BRAZIL. Law n° 9.307 (Sep. 23, 1996). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9307.htm. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BRAZIL. Law n° 9.610 (Feb. 19, 1998). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9610.htm. Accessed on: June 25, 2022.

BROWNLIE, Ian; CRAWFORD, James Crawford. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. 8. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

CONVENTION Respecting the Limitation of the Employment of Force for the Recovery of Contract Debts. The American Journal of International Law, v. 2, n. 1/2, Supplement: Official Documents, Jan.-Apr./1908. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2212500. Accessed on 12 ago. 2022.

CORRÊA, A. A. de C. Rui e a Doutrina Drago. Revista da Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo, v. 62, n. 1, p. 267-282, 1966.

FRANCA FILHO, Marcílio Toscano; MIALHE, Jorge Luís; JOB, Ulisses da Silveira (Eds.) Epitácio Pessoa e a Codificação do Direito Internacional. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor, 2013.

FRANCK, Susan D. Foreign direct investment, investment treaty arbitration and the rule of law. McGeorge Global Business and Development Law Journal, v. 19, p. 337-373, 2007.

GUERRA, Paulo de Brito. A civilização da seca. Fortaleza: DNOCS, 1981.

HULSEBOSCH, Daniel J. From Imperial to International Law: protecting foreign expectations in the early United States. UCLA Law Review, v. 65, n. 4, p. 4-18, 2018.

HUNTER, Martin; CONDE E SILVA, Gui. A Ordem Pública Transnacional e a sua Operação nas Arbitragens Relativas a Investimentos. In: LEMES, Selma Ferreira; CARMONA, Carlos Alberto; MARTINS, Pedro Batista (Eds.). Arbitragem: estudos em homenagem ao Prof. Guido Fernando Silva Soares. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.

KALICKI, Jean; MEDEIROS, Suzana. Investment Arbitration in Brazil: Revisiting Brazil’s Traditional Reluctance Towards ICSID, BITs and Investor-State Arbitration. Revista de Arbitragem e Mediação, v. 4, n. 14, 57-86, 2007.

MAGANO, Octavio Bueno. Manual de direito do trabalho, volume IV: direito tutelar do trabalho. São Paulo: LTr, 1987.

MAGGETTI, Martino; MORAES, Henrique Choer. The Policy-Making of Investment Treaties in Brazil: Policy Learning in the Context of Late Adoption. In: DUNLOP, C; RADAELLI, C.; TREIN, P. (Eds.). Learning in Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, p. 295-316.

MERRILS, J. G. International Dispute Settlement. 6. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

MUNIZ, Petronio R. G. Operação Arbiter: a História da Lei n° 9.307/96 Sobre a Arbitragem Comercial no Brasil. Brasília: ITN, 2005.

PESSOA, Epitácio. Dissenting Opinion – Brazilian Loans. Available at: https://jusmundi.com/en/document/opinion/en-brazilian-loans-dissenting-opinion-by-m-pessoa-friday-12th-july-1929. Accessed on 12 ago. 2022.

PESSOA, Epitácio. Obras completas de Epitácio Pessoa, vol. XVI: laudos arbitrais. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional do Livro, 1961.

RAMOS, André de Carvalho. Direito internacional privado de matriz legal: os arts. 7º a 19 da Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro. In: RAMOS, André de Carvalho; GRAMSTRUP, Erik Frederico. Comentários à Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.

REZEK, Francisco. Direito internacional público: curso elementar. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.

RUBINS, Noah D. Investment Arbitration in Brazil. ALMEIDA, Ricardo Ramalho (Ed.). Arbitragem interna e internacional: questões de doutrina e de prática. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2003, p. 95-128.

SHIHATA, Ibrahim F.I. Towards a Greater Depoliticization of Investment Disputes: The Roles of ICSID and MIGA. ICSID Review—Foreign Investment Law Journal, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-15, 1986.

TEIXEIRA, Sálvio de Figueiredo. A arbitragem no sistema jurídico brasileiro. Revista dos Tribunais, v. 735, p. 39-48, 1997.

VALLADÃO, Haroldo. Democratização e socialização do direito internacional: os impactos latino-americano e afro-asiático. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 1961.

WERNER, Jacques. Limits of Commercial Investor-State Arbitration: the Need for Appellate Review. In: DUPUY, Pierre-Marie; FRANCIONI; Francesco; PETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich (Eds.). Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 115-117.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v19i3.8620

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia