A promoção da accountability na Organização Mundial do Comércio: uma análise horizontal e vertical
Résumé
Mots-clés
Texte intégral :
PDF (Português (Brasil))Références
BAIMU, Evarist; PANOU, Aristeidis. Responsibility of International Organizations and the World Bank Inspection Panel: parallel tracks unlikely to converge? In:
CISSE, Hassane; BRADLOW, Daniel D.; KINGSBURY, Benedict. The World Bank legal review: international financial institutions and global legal governance. Washington: The World Bank, 2012. v. 3.
BATTLE of Seattle. Direção: Stuart Townsend. Hyde Park International, 2007.
BOSSCHE, Van den. The law and policy of the World Trade Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
BRASIL. Decreto 1.355 de 30 de dezembro de 1994. Promulgo a Ata Final que Incorpora os Resultados da Rodada Uruguai de Negociações Comerciais Multilaterais do GATT. Presidência da República. Brasília, 30 dez. 1994.
CHAISSE, Julien; CHAKRABORTY, Debashis, Implementing WTO rules through negotiations and sanction: the role of Trade Policy Review Mechanism and Dispute Settlement System. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, Philadelphia, v. 28, n. 1, 2007.
CHARNOVITZ, Steve. Transparency and participation in the World Trade Organization. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper, Washington, n. 142, 2004.
COMISSÃO SOBRE GOVERNANÇA GLOBAL. Nossa comunidade global: o relatório da Comissão Sobre Governança Global. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 1996.
DUBNICK, Melvin J.; ROMZEK, Barbara. Accountability. In: SHAFRITZ, Jay M. (Org.). The International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. Westview Press, 1998. v. 1.
FROESE, Marc D. Between surveillance and transparency: trade policy review and north american dispute settlement at the WTO. Canadian University College: Lacombe Paper, p. 1-39, abr. 2012.
GRANT, Ruth W.; KEOHANE, Robert O. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, v. 99, n. 1, fev. 2005.
HALLE, Mark; WOLFE, Robert; BEATON, Christopher. Looking back, looking forward: civil society contributions to WTO accountability. ENTWINED Issue Brief, n. 8, 2011.
KEOHANE, Robert O.. Global governance and democratic accountability. In: HELD, David; KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI, Mathias (Eds.). Taming globalization: frontiers of governance. Cambridge: Polity Press: 2002.
KEOHANE, Robert O.; NYE, Joseph S. Power and interdependence. Boston: Scott, Foresman and Company, 2001.
KINGSBURY, Benedict; KRISCH, Nico; STEWART, Richard B. The emergence of global administrative law. Law and Contemporany Problems, North Carolina, v. 68, n. 3-4, p. 15-62, 2005.
LAFER, Celso. A OMC e a regulamentação do comércio internacional: uma visão brasileira. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 1998.
LESTER, Simon. Accountability at the WTO. International Economic Law and Policy Blog. 13 dez. 2009. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 15 jan. 2014.
MARCEAU, Gabrielle; HURLEY, Mikaella. Transparency and public participation in the WTO: a report card on WTO transparency mechanisms. Trade, Law and
Development, v. 4, n. 1, p. 19-44, 2012.
MAVROIDIS, Petros C. Amicus curiae briefs before the WTO: much ado about nothing. Jean Monnet Working Paper, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2002.
MITCHELL, Andrew D.; SHEARGOLD, Elizabeth. Global governance: the World Trade Organization’s contribution. Alberta Law Review, Alberta, v. 46, p. 1061- 1080, jan. 2010.
MULGAN, Richard. One cheer for hierarchly: accountability in disjointed governance. Political Science, v. 55, n. 2, p.6-18, 2003.
NANZ, Patricia; STEFFEK, Jens. Global governance, participation and the public sphere. In: HELD, David; KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI, Matias. (Ed.). Globalgovernance and public accountability. Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell, 2005. p. 190-211.
PALMER, Alice. Observando de fora: participação da sociedade civil no Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da OMC. In: BAPTISTA, Luiz Olavo; CELLI JUNIOR, Umberto; YANOVICH, Alan (Org.). 10 anos de OMC: uma análise do Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias e perspectivas. São Paulo: Aduaneiras, 2007.
PAUWELYN, Joost; BERMAN, Ayelet. Emergency action by the WTO director-general: global administrative law and the WTO’s initial response to the 2008–09 financial crisis. International Organizations Law Review. v.6, p.499-512, 2009.
PEDRAZA-FARINA, Laura G. Conceptions of civil society in international law-making and implementation: a theoretical framework. Michigan Journal of International Law, Michigan, v. 34, n. 3, p. 101-173, 2013.
PEREZ-ESTEVE, Maria. WTO rules and practices for transparency and engagement with civil society organizations. Staff Working Paper ERSD, Genebra, v. 14, p. 1-28, 2012.
RUBENSTEIN, Jennifer. Accountability in an unequal world. Journal of Politics, v. 69, n. 3, p. 616–632, ago. 2007.
SANCHEZ BADIN, Michelle Ratton. Breves considerações sobre os mecanismos de participação para ONGs na OMC. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, n. 4, ano 3, p. 102-125, 2006.
SCHMIDT, Luis Felipe Flores. A construção da retaliação brasileira no caso algodão: os desafios do pioneirismo. In: BENJAMIN, Daniela Arruda (Org.). O sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da OMC: uma perspectiva brasileira. Brasília: FUNAG, 2013.
SCHOLTE, Jan Aart. Global governance, accountability and civil society. In:
SCHOLTE, Jan Aart (Ed.). Building global democracy: civil society and global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
SILVA, Luiz Fernando Martins da. Amicus curiae: direito e ação afirmativa. Revista Jurídica, Brasília, v. 7, n. 76, p. 70-78, 2006.
SMYTHE, Elizabeth; SMITH, Peter J. Legitimacy, transparency, and information technology: the World Trade Organization in an era of contentious trade politics. Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, v. 12, n. 1, p. 31-53, jan. 2006.
STEWART, Richard B.; SANCHEZ BADIN, Michelle Ratton. The World Trade Organization and global administrative law. NYU School ofLaw Public Law Research Paper, Nova Iorque, n. 09-71, p. 1-31, 2009.
UNCTAD. Curso de solução de disputas em comércio internacional, investimento e propriedade intelectual. Modulo 3.3: Apelação. Nova Iorque e Genebra: ONU, 2003.
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND EMPLOYMENT. Final act and related documents. Interim Comission for the International Trade Organization: Lake Success, abr. 1948.
VANGRASSTEK, Craig. The history and the future of the World Trade Organization. Genebra: WTO Publications, 2013.
WILLIAMS, Mark. Civil society and the WTO: contesting accountability. In:
SCHOLTE, Jan Aart (Ed.). Building global democracy: civil society and global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
WOLFE, Robert. Who is accountable at the World Trade Organization?: anatomy of a trilemma within a dilemma. Kingston, p. 1-19, (no prelo).
WTO. WT/L/162: Guidelines for arrangements on relations with Non-Governmental Organizations. Genebra, 23 jul. 1996. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 20 fev. 2014.
WTO. WT/DS58/AB/R: United States - Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products. Genebra, 12 out. 1998.
WTO. WT/DS138/AB/R: United States – Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom. Genebra, 10 mai. 2000.WTO. WT/GC/M/60: minutes of meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 22 November 2000. Genebra, 23 jan. 2001.
WTO. WT/DS135/AB/R: European Communities — Measures Affecting Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos. Genebra, 12 mar. 2001.
WTO. The future of the WTO: addressing institutional challenges in the new
millennium. Genebra: WTO Publications, 2004.
WTO. Understanding the WTO. Genebra: WTO Publications, 2008.
WTO. The WTO agreements series: sanitary and phytosanitary measures. Genebra: WTO Publications, 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 12 dez. 2014.
WTO. Trade policy reviews: brief introduction. Genebra. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 14 fev. 2014a.
WTO. Trade monitoring. Genebra. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 02 mar. 2014b.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v11i2.3145
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)