Une définition du pré-investissement conforme à l’approche français mais contraire à l’approche américaine au sein des traités bilatéraux d’investissements iraniens

Peyman Dadras

Résumé


The role of international investment law is well known throughout the world. In order to develop the internal economy of a country, it is necessary to obtain foreign funds in the context of an investment whatever the nature of the activity. National laws on foreign investment, often referred to as the "investments code", still probably have practical importance on the treatment of foreign investment to the extent that the state remains competent to regulate Entry and development of investment in its territory, even in the presence of an international convention. In this regard, the pre-investment, defined as all operations in connection with an investment in being realized on the territory of the host State, respects standards for the admission and establishment of that investment. In the context of a comparison between the United States, France and Iran on the admission of foreign investment (pre-investment) it is very remarkable in the view of the sovereignty of the state of the point where the investment will develop.

Texte intégral :

PDF (English)

Références


BEN HAMIDA (W). The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case : some thoughts relating to the status of pre investments expenditure. International investment law and arbitration, Ca­meron, , p. 47-66, May, 2005.

BEN HAMIDA (W). Les contrats BOT à l’épreuve du nouveau droits des investissements internationaux, in Travaux du Centre d’étude et de recherche de droit international à l’accadémie de droit international de la Haye. TDM, v. 4, issue 4, juillet 2007. Disponível em: www.transnational-dispute-management.com.

CARREAU, (D); JUILLARD, (P). Droit international économique. Paris : Dalloz, 2010.

DOLZER, (R); STEVENS (M). Bilateral Investment Treaties. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers the Ha­gue, 1995.

DOSSIER Investissement direct étranger des États-Unis en 2014. Disponível em: http://www.tresor. economie.gouv.fr/12904_les-investissements-directs-etrangers-des-Etats-Unis-en-2014.

DRAFT agreement between the government of the re­public of france and the government of the republic of (...) on the reciprocal promotion and protection of investments. Disponível em: http://italaw.com/docu­ments/ModelTreatyFrance2006.pdf.

Droit des investissements internationaux. Régime du droit interne », Jurisclasseur de droit international, fasc. 572-55.

FRANÇA. Décret n°67-78 du 27 janvier 1967. FIXANT LES MODALITES D’APPLICATION DE LA LOI 661008 DU 28-12-1966 RELATIVES AUX RELA­TIONS FINANCIERES AVEC L’ETRANGER. Disponível em: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/af­fichTexteArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI0000066372 86&cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000877280.

FRANÇA. Loi n° 66-1008 du 28 décembre 1966. relative aux relations financières avec l’étranger. Disponível em: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000880207&categorieLien=cid.

INVEST IN IRAN. [Homepage]. Disponível em: http://www.investiniran.ir/en/home.

INVESTISSEMENTS étrangers en France. Disponível em: http://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/investisse­ments-etrangers-en-france.

JUILLARD, (P). A propos du décès de l’AMI. AFDI, 1998.

KODAMA, (Y). The Multilateral Agreement on In­vestment and its legal implication for newly industriali­zing economies. JWT, v. 32, n. 4, p. 21-40, 1998.

LA LOI de 1955 concernant de la promotion et la protection de l’investisseur étranger en Iran. In: EF­TEKHAR, (R.). les modifications des traités bilatéraux d’in­vestissement de l’Iran à la lumière des développements récentes du droit de l’investissement, Mémoire du Master 2. Téhéran: Université Shahid Beheshti, 2009. p.10-13

LEBEN, (Ch.). Le droit international des affaires. PUF 6ème édition. Cidade: editora, 2003.

Mihaly international corrporation c./ République démocratique socialiste de Sri Lanka, l’affaire précité à la note n° 91.

MILSTAJN, (A). l’admissibilité des investissements étrangers: comparaison Etats-Unis/France. Paris: université paris 1, ano.

NAFTA. Disponível em: http://www.naftanow.org/ l’article 1108.

Ph. Gruslin c./ Malasie, ICSID Case n° ARB/99/3, Sentence du 27 novembre 2000, 5 ICSID Report, 2002,p. 484.

SERVAN-SCHREIBER, Pierre. Approche comparée des investissements internationaux entre la France et les EtatsUnis. Paris: l’Université Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas, 2012.

SNODGRASS (E). Protecting investor’s legitimate ex­pectations: recognizing and delimiting a general princi­ple. ICSID Rev, p. 1-58, 2006.

SUR les lois d’investissement étranger. Disponível em: http://www.investiniran.ir/fr/foreigninvestment/ laws.

THE COMMITTEE on Foreign Investment in the United States. Disponível em : https://www.treasury. gov/resource-center/international/Pages/Committee-on-Foreign-Investment-in-US.aspx.

U.S DEPSRTAMENT OF STATE. Celebrating Interna­tional womens day. Disponível em: https://Www.State. Gov/.

UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT. World Consumer Rights Day. Disponível em: http://unctad.org/en/pages/DIAE/International%20Investment%20Agreements%20 (IIA)/UNCTAD-Series-on-issues-on-international-in­vestment-agreements.aspx.

VADCAR, (C). Le projet d’Accord multilatéral sur l’investisse­ment: problématique de l’adhésion des pays du Sud. JDI, 1998.

VANDEVELDE, (K. J.). United States treaties. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2009.

WILLIAM, Nagel c. / République tchèque, Sentence du 9 septembre 2003, SCC Case n° 49/2002, 1 SAR, 2004, p. 145. Disponível em: www.sccinstitute.com/uk.

WOLTERS (Y). The meaning of « investment in trea­ty disputes: substantive or jurisdictional? Lessons from Nagel v. Czech Republic and S.D. Myers v. Canada. JWI & T, v. 8, n. 1, p. 175-185, 2007.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v14i1.4548

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia