Direito global em pedaços: fragmentação, regimes e pluralismo
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ABBOTT, K. W.;SNIDAL D. Strengthening Internatio¬nal Regulation through Transnational New Governan¬ce: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, p. 1-69, 2009.
ABI SAAB, G. Fragmentantion or Unification: Some Concluding Remarks. NYU Journal of International Law and Policy, v. 31, p. 919-933, 1998.
BARTLEY, T. Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regu¬lation of Labor and Environmental Conditions. Ameri can Journal of Sociology, v. 113, n. 2, p. 297-351, 2007.
BENVENISTI, E.; DOWNS, G. W. National Courts Review of Transnational Private Regulation. n. 2003, p. 1-18, 2005. (working paper) Disponível em: http://pa¬pers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1742452.
BÖRZEL, T. A.;HEARD-LAURÉOTE, K. Networks in EU Multi-level Governance: Concepts and Contribu¬tions. Journal of Public Policy, v. 29, n. 02, p. 135-151, 2009.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal Federal. Arguição de De¬scumprimento de Preceito Fundamental no. 101 (ADPF-101). Portaria DECEX N. 8. Proibição de Pneus Usados. Relatora: Ministra Carmem Lúcia. DF 21.09.2006.
CAFAGGI, F. New Foundations of Transnational Pri¬vate Regulation. EUI Working Papers. p. 1-40, 2010.
CAROTTI, B.; SAVINO, M. Global Administrati¬ve Law: cases, materials, issues. New York University School of Law, 2008. Disponível em: http://iilj.org/ GAL/documents/GALCasebook2008.pdf.
CASSESE, S. Global Administrative law: An Introduc¬tion. Anais da IIJL Conference. 2005. Disponível em: http://www.iilj.org/GAL/documents/GALCasebo¬okBibliography.pdf.
CHESTERMAN, S. Global Administrative Law. Wor¬king Paper for the S.T. Lee Project on Global Gover¬nance. 2009 .Disponível em: http://www.ssrn.com/ abstract=1435170.
CIJ. Case Concerning Military And Paramilitary Acti¬vities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United State of America), Mérito, 1986, §172). Disponível em: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=367&c ode=nus&p1=3&p2=3&case=70&k=66&p3=5.
COMISSÃO Europeia - Assuntos Legais, Sumário de Sentenças importantes, Caso C-459/03 (Comissão v. Irlanda), 2006.
CPA. Caso MoxPlant, (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Ordem no. 1 – Ireland’s Amended Statement of Claim, 2002.
CPA. Caso Mox Plant, (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Ordem no. 4 – Outras Suspensões de Jurisdição e Mérito, 2003.
CPA. Caso Mox Plant, (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Ordem no. 4 – Outras Suspensões de Jurisdição e Mérito, 2003.
CPA. Caso Mox Plant, (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Ordem no. 5 – Suspensão dos Relatórios Periódicos pelas Par-tes, 2007.
CPA. Caso Mox Plant, (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Ordem no. 6 – Fim dos Procedimentos, 2008.
CPA. Caso Mox Plant, (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Ordem No. 3 – Suspensão dos Procedimentos de Jurisdição e Mérito, e Pedidos de Medidas Cautelares, 2003.
CPA. Caso Mox Plant, (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Ordem no. 2 – Tempo Limite para Submissões e pedidos, 2002.
DANN, P.; GOLDMANN, M.; BOGDANDY, A.. De¬veloping the Publicness of Public International Law : Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities. German Law Journal, v. 9, n. 11, p. 1375- 1400, 2007.
DAVIS, D.; CORDER, H. Globalization, National De¬mocratic Institutions and the Impact of Global Regula¬tory Governance on Developing Countries. Acta Juridi¬ca, v. 09, p. 68-89, 2009.
Dicionário PRIBERAM de Língua Portuguesa Online. Disponível em: http://www.priberam.pt/dlpo/default. aspx pal=regula%u00e7%u00e3o.
DUPUY, P.-M. A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalization Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law. Eu-ropean Journal O Legal Studies, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2007.
ESTY, D. C. Good Governance at the Supranational Scale : Globalizing Administrative Law. The Yale Law Journal, v. 115, n. 7, p. 1490-1562, 2011.
FISHER-LESCANO, ANDREAS; TEUBNER, G. Regime-Collisions? The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 25, p. 999-1046, 2004.
FORNASIER, Mateus de O.; FERREIRA, Luciano V. A regulação das empresas transnacionais entre as or¬dens jurídicas estatais e não estatais. Revista de Direito In¬ternacional, v. 12, n.1, 2015
GIFIS, Steven H. BARRON’S LAW DICTIONARY.
GONTIJO, André P. Os Caminhos Fragmentados da Proteção Humana: o peticionamento individual, o con-ceito de vítima e o amicus curiae como indicadores do acesso aos sistemas interamericano e europeu de pro-teção aos direitos humanos. Revista de Direito Internacio¬nal, v. 9, n.1, 2012.
HAFNER, G. Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmen¬135
tation of International Law. Michigan Journal of Inter¬national Law, v. 25, p. 849-863, 2004.
HALBERSTAM, D. Local, Global and Plural Con¬stitutionalism: Europe meets the world. 2009. (wor¬king paper) Disponível em: http://ssrn.com/ab¬stract=1521016.
HANSENCLEVER, A.; MAYER, P.; RITTBERGER, V. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cam¬bridge University Press, 1997.
HARLOW, C. Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values. European Journal of Interna-tional Law, v. 17, n. 1, p. 187-214, 2006.
HART, H. L. A.O conceito de direito.São Paulo: Mar¬tins Fontes, 2012.
HOOGHE, LIESBET; MARKS, G. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Gover¬nance. The American Political Science Review, v. 97, n. 2, p. 233-243, 2003.
HOUAISS, Antônio e VILLAR, Mauro Salles. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2001, p. 2418.
JACKSON, J. H. Fragmentation or Unification Among International Institutions: The World Trade Organiza¬tion. New York Journal of International Law and Poli¬tics, v. 31, p. 823-831, 1999.
KELSEN, H. A Teoria Pura do Direito. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.
KEYNES, J. M.; LEO, C. Multi-Level Governance and Ideological Rigidity : The Failure of Deep Federalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science, v. 42, n. 1, p. 93- 116, 2009.
KINGSBURY, B. The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law. European Journal of International Law, v. 20, n. 1, p. 23-57, 2009.
KINGSBURY, B.. Co-Option and Resistance : Two Fa¬ces of Global Administrative Law. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, v. 38, p. 799- 827, 2005.
KINGSBURY, B.; KRISCH, S.; STEWART, R. The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 68, 2005, p. 18.
KINGSBURY, B.; KRISCH, S.; STEWART, R.; WIE¬NER, J.B.. Global Governance as Administration-Na¬tional and Transnational Approaches to Global Admi¬nistrative law. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 68, n. 3-4, p. 1-13, 2005.
KOCH, C. H. Globalization of Administrative and Re¬gulatory Practice. Administrative Law Review, v. 54, n. 1, p. 409-414, 2002.
KOSKENNIEMI, M. Global Legal Pluralism: Multiple Regimes and Multiple Modes of Thought. Palestra pro-ferida em Harvard em 5 de março de 2005.
KOSKENNIEMI, M.; LEINO, P. Fragmentation of International Law ? Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 14, n. 3, p. 553-579, 2002.
KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. Study on the Function and Scope of the lex specialis Rule and the Question of “Self-Contained Regimes, Preliminary Report by Martti Koskenniemi, Chairman of the Study Group of the ILC. Maio de 2004, p. 9.
KRASNER, S. Structural causes and regime consequen¬ces: regimes as intervening variables. In: KRASNER, S. (Ed.). International Regimes. Ithaka/London: Cornell University Press, 1983.
KRASNER, Stephen D (ed.). International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983.
KRISCH, N. Global Administrative Law and the Con¬stitutional Ambition. Law, Society Economy Working Papers. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.lse.ac.uk/col¬lections/law/wps/WPS2009-10_Krisch.pdf.
KRISCH, N. Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order. European Journal of International Law, v. 17, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2006.
KRISCH, N. The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law. European Journal of International Law, v. 17, n. 1, p. 247-278, 2006b.
KUO, M.-S. The Concept of “Law” in Global Admini¬strative Law: A Reply to Benedict Kingsbury. European Journal of International Law, v. 20, n. 4, p. 997-1004, 2010.
LIMA, Gabriela G. B. Conceitos de relações internacio¬nais e teoria do direito diante dos efeitos pluralistas da globalização: governança global, regimes jurídicos, di¬reito refexivo, pluralismo jurídico, corregulação e autor-regulação. Revista de Direito Internacional, v.11, n.1, 2014.
MARKS, S. Naming Global Administrative Law. New York Journal of International Law and Politics, v. 95, p. 136
-1002, 2005.
MARTINEAU, A.-C. The Rhetoric of Fragmentation: Fear and Faith in International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 22, n. 01, p. 1, 2009.
MCLEAN, J. Divergent Conceptions of the State: Implications for Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 68, n. 3, p. 167-187, 2005.
MERCOSUL. Criação do grupo ad hoc para uma políti¬ca regional sobre pneus, inclusive reformados e usados GAHP ( MERCOSUL/GMC EXT/RES. Nº 25/08), 29.06. 2008; CAMEX, Resolução no. 38, 22.10.2007.
MERCOSUL. Tribunal Arbitral - Laudo Arbitral de las presentes actuaciones ante este Tribunal Arbitral rela¬tivas a la controversia entre la República Oriental del Uruguay (Parte Reclamante, em adelante “Uruguay”) y la República Federativa del Brasil (Parte Reclamada, enadelante “Brasil”) sobre “Prohibición de Importa¬ción de Neumáticos Remoldeados (Remolded) Proce¬dentes de Uruguay, 2006.
MICHAELIS: Moderno Dicionário da Língua Portu¬guesa. São Paulo: Companhia Melhoramentos, 1998, p. 1804.
MICHAELS, R. The Mirage of Non-State Governance. Utah Law Review, v. 63, p. 1-15, 2010;
NASSER, S. H. Fontes e Normas do Direito Interna¬cional: Um Estudo sobre a Soft Law. 2a. ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2006.
NASSER, S. H. Rule of Law e Direito International: uma nova aproximação. In: VILHENA, OSCAR; DI¬MOULIS, D. (Ed.). Estado de Direito e o Desafio do Desenvolvimento. 1. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2011.
OMC, Brasil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retre¬aded Tyres, Status Report by Brazil, Notification of an Appeal by the European Communities under Arti¬cle 16.4 and Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU),and under Rule 20(1) of the Working Procedu¬res for Appellate Review, 2007, (WT/DS332/9).
OMC. Brasil – Measures Affecting Imports of Re¬treaded Tyres, Status Report by Brazil, 2009 (WT/ DS332/19).
OMC. Brasil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retrea¬ded Tyres., 2008 (WT/DS332/16).
PIATTONI, S. Multi-level Governance: a Historical and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of European Integra¬tion, v. 31, n. 2, p. 163-180, 2009.
RAZ, Joseph.O conceito de sistema jurídico:uma intro¬dução à teoria dos sistemas jurídicos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012
RELATÓRIO da Comissão de Direito Internacional, 2006.
SALAMA, R. Fragmentation of International Law: Procedural Issues Arising of the Sea Disputes.
SANCHEZ, M. R. The Global Administrative Law Project : A review from Brazil. Artigos Direito GV, v. 38, p. 1-14, 2009.
SCHMIDT-ASSMAN, B. E. The Internationalization of Administrative Relations as a Challenge for Admi-nistrative Law Scholarship. German Law Journal, v 9, n. 11, 2006.
SHAPIRO, M. Administrative Law Unbounded : Re¬flections on Government and Governance. Indiana Journal of Legal Studies, v. 8, n. 2, p. 369-377, 2001.
SIMMA, B. Fragmentation in a Positive Light. Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 25, p. 845-847, 2012.
SLAUGHTER, A-M. Everyday Global Governance. Research Library Core, v. 132, n. 1, p. 83-90, 2003.
TCE. Comissão da Comunidade Europeia v. Irlan¬da, Caso C-459/03, 2006.Disponível em: http:// eurl e x . e u ropa.eu/LexUr i S e r v/LexUr i S e r v. do?uri=CELEX:62003CJ0459:EN:PDF
TCE. Comissão da Comunidade Europeia v. Irlan¬da, Caso C-459/03, 2006.Disponível em: http:// eur- l e x.europa.eu/LexUriSer v/LexUriSer v. do?uri=CELEX:62003J0459:EN:HTML
TEUBNER, G. Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society. In: TEUBNER, G (Ed.). Global Law in the World Society. Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1997. p. 3-28;
TEUBNER, G. K. P. Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Frag-mentation of World Society. In: YOUNG, M. (Ed.). Re¬gime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmen-tation. 1. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
TIDM. Caso Mox Pant. (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Me¬didas Cautelares, No. 10, Ordem 2001/3, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlodocuments/cases/case_no_10/Order.03.12.01.E.pdf
TIDM. Caso Mox Plant. (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Me¬morial da Irlanda, Volume 1, 2002, §§ 4.35-4.36.
TIDM. Caso Mox Plant. (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Medi¬das Cautelares com base no art. 290 § 5º da Convenção do Mar das Nações Unidas, No. 10, Ordem 2001/5, 2001.
TIDM. Caso Mox Plant. (Irlanda v. Reino Unido), Medi¬das Cautelares com base no art. 290 § 5º da Convenção do Mar das Nações Unidas, No. 10, Ordem 2001/5, 2001.
TRIBUNAL Internacional para Ruanda. Caso Jean Paul, Sentença, 02.10.1998 (Caso No: ICTR - 96 - 4 – T). International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Per¬sons Responsible for Serious Violations of Internatio¬nal Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia,
TRIBUNAL Penal Internacional para a antiga Iugo¬slávia. Caso Zlatko Aleksovski, 1999 (Caso no. IT- 95-14/1-T)
TRUBEK, D. M.; TRUBEK, L. G. New Governance & Legal Regulation : Complementarity, Rivalry , and Tran-sformation. Columbia Journal of International Law, v. 13, p. 1-26, 2007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v12i2.3707
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)