Hardening Soft Law: Are the emerging corporate social disclosure and due diligence laws capable of generating substantive compliance with human rights norms?

Justine Nolan

Resumo


The aim of this paper is to examine the potential effectiveness and limitations of the emerging mandated social disclosure and human rights due diligence laws. Globalization has led to the emergence of low cost, efficient (but risky) supply chains that span multiple sourcing countries which exhibit a wide range of economic, political, social, labor and environmental standards. The five laws examined seek to provide mechanisms that aim to reduce the negative human rights impact of business in supply chains. They introduce varying demands on business to map, track and disclose how and where their products are being made. This paper first briefly highlights the preponderance of soft law that defines the business and human rights regulatory framework and guides corporate behavior. It then examines three mandated disclosure laws, the Dodd-Frank Act, the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act and the UK Modern Slavery Act and two due diligence focused laws, the Australian Illegal Logging Prohibition Act and the French Duty of Corporate Vigilance Law. After which, it proposes criteria to strengthen the development and implementation of these laws. It concludes by noting that while these laws are hardening the human rights expectations of business, for them to generate substantive (and not just procedural) human rights compliance they must incorporate: detailed requirements on reporting and due diligence: collaboration with external stakeholders and; compliance measures. Through analysis of these regulatory developments this paper seeks to provide greater understanding of how to shape regulatory responses to governance gaps in transnational supply chains.

Palavras-chave


Business, Human Rights, Modern Slavery, Disclosure, Due Diligence, Transparency

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


AYRES, A.; BRAITHWAITE, J. Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

BACCARO, L.; MELE, V. For Lack of Anything Better? International Organizations and Global Corporate Codes. Public Administration, v. 89, n. 2, p. 451–470, 2011.

BAYER C.; HUDSON, J. Corporate compliance with the California transparency in supply chains act: anti-slavery performance in 2016. 2017. Available in: https://static1. squarespace.com/static/5862e332414fb56e15dd20b9/ t/58bf06e346c3c478cf76d619/1488914152831/CATISCA.v.24_secured.pdf.

BENJAMIN, T.; PURVIS, J. G.; Corporate supply chain transparency: California’s seminal attempt to discourage forced labour. The International Journal of Human Rights, v. 20, n. 1, p. 55-77, 2016.

BERLINER, D. et. al. Governing global supply chains: what we know (and don’t) about improving labor rights and working conditions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, v. 11, n. 1, p. 193–209, 2015.

BERTHELOT, S.; CORMIER, D.; MAGNAN, M. Environmental disclosure research: review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, v. 22, p. 1–44, 2003.

BIRKEY, R. et al. Mandated social disclosure: an analysis of the response to the California transparency in supply chains act 2010. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-15, 2016. Available in: https://link.springer.com/ar ticle/10.1007%2Fs10551-016-3364-7.

BUSINESS HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESOURCE CENTRE; ITUC CSI IGB. Modern slavery in company operations and supply chains: mandatory transparency, mandatory due diligence and public procurement due diligence. 2017. Available in: https://www.ituc-csi.org/ modern-slavery-in-company.

CASSEL, D.; RAMASASTRY, A. White paper: options for a treaty on business and human rights. 2015. Available in: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjicl/vol6/ iss1/4/.

CLEAN CLOTHES CAMPAIGN. Looking for a quick fix: how weak social auditing is keeping workers in sweatshops. 2005. Available in: https://cleanclothes.org/ resources/publications/05-quick-fix.pdf/view.

CORE COALITION; BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE. Register of slavery & human trafficking corporate statements released to date to comply with uk modern slavery act 2016.

CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHTS BENCHMARK. Key Findings 2017. 2017. Available in: https://www. corporatebenchmark.org/.

CRAGG, W. Business and human rights: a principle and value-based analysis. 2012. Available in: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/290790009_Business_ and_Human_Rights_A_Principle_and_Value-Based_ Analysis.

DANISH INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. Human Rights Impact and Assessment Guidance and Toolbox. Available in: https://www.humanrights.dk/sites/ humanrights.dk/files/media/dokumenter/business/ hria_toolbox/introduction/welcome_and_introduction_final_may2016.pdf_223791_1_1.pdf.

DEVA, S. Regulating corporate human rights violations. London: Routledge, 2012.

DEVA, S. Treating human rights lightly: a critique of the consensus rhetoric and the language employed by the guiding principles. In: DEVA, S.; BILCHITZ, D. Human rights obligations of business: beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

DOOREY, D. J. Who Made that? influencing foreign labour practices through reflexive domestic disclosure regulation. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, v. 43, n. 4, 2005. Available in: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1325&context=ohlj.

ERGON ASSOCIATES. Reporting on modern slavery: the current state of disclosure. 2016. Available in: http:// www.ergonassociates.net/images/stories/articles/er- gonmsastatement2.pdf.

ETHICAL TRADING INITIATIVE. Human rights due diligence framework. Available in: http://www.ethicaltrade.org/issues/due-diligence.

FAIR LABOR ASSOCIATION. Supply chain traceability and transparency: shifting industry norms, emerging regulations, and greater interest from civil society. 2017. Available in: http://www.fairlabor.org/blog/entry/ supply-chain-traceability-and-transparency.

FRIEDMAN, M. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

G20 MINISTERIAL DECLARATION. Towards na inclusive future: shaping the world of work: G20 labor and employment ministers meeting. 2017. Available in: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2017/170519-labour.html.

GEREFFI, G.; HUMPHREY, J.; STURGEON, T. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, v. 12, n. 1, p. 78–104, 2005.

GRABOSKY P. Beyond responsive regulation: the ex panding role of non‐state actors in the regulatory process. Regulation and Governance, v. 7, n. 1, p.114-123, mar. 2013.

GUNNINGHAM, G.; GRABOSKY, P. Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. New York: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1998.

HENDERSON, D. Misguided virtue: false notions of corporate social responsibility. Institute of Public Affairs. 2001. Available in: https://iea.org.uk/publications/ research/misguided-virtue-false-notions-of-corporate-social-responsibility.

HOUSE OF LORDS, HOUSE OF COMMONS JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS. Human rights and business 2017: promoting responsibility and ensuring accountability. Available in: https:// www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201617/jtselect/ jtrights/443/443.pdf.

HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL. Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the united nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. 2011. Available in: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf.

HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL. Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights: report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie. 2008. Available in: http://www.refworld.org/ docid/484d2d5f2.html.

ISEAL ALLIANCE. Assuring compliance with social and environmental standards: code of good practice. Available in: https://www.isealalliance.org/online-community/ resources/assurance-code-version-10.

KINLEY, D.; TADAKI, J. From Talk to walk: the emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 44, n. 4, 2004.

KNOW THE CHAIN. Five years of the California transparency in supply chains act. 2015. Available in: https:// knowthechain.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ KnowTheChain_InsightsBrief_093015.pdf.

KRAWIEC, K. D. Cosmetic compliance and the failure of negotiated governance. Washington University Law Quarterly, v. 81, p. 487-544, 2003.

LEBARON, G.; LISTER, J. Speri Global Political Economy Brief n. 1: ethical audits and the supply chains of Global Corporations. 2016. Available in: http://speri.dept. shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Global-Brief-1-Ethical-Audits-and-the-Supply-Chains-of-Global-Corporations.pdf.

LOCKE, R. The promise and limits of private power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

LOCKE, R.; AMENGUAL, M.; MANGLA, A. Virtue out of Necessity? Compliance, Commitment, and the Improvement of Labor Conditions in Global Supply Chains. Politics & Society, v. 37, n. 3, 2009.

MCCORQUODALE, R. et. al. Human rights due diligence in law and practice: good practices and challenges for business enterprises. Business and Human Rights Journal, v. 2, n. 2, p. 195-224, jul. 2017.

MCCORQUODALE, R.; BONNITCHA, J. The concept of “Due Diligence” in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. European Journal of International Law, v. 28, 2017.

MICHALOWSKI, S. Due diligence and complicity: a relationship in need of clarification. In: DEVA, S.; BILCHITZ, D. Human rights obligations of business: beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 218-242.

NELSON, A. The materiality of morality: conflict minerals. Utah Law Review, p. 291-241, 2014.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains in the garment and footwear sector. 2017. Available in: https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/ oecd-due-diligence-guidance-garment-footwear.pdf.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Due diligence guidance for responsible business conduct OECD publishing. 2018. Available in: http://www.oecd.org/investment/due-iligence-guidance-for-responsible-business-conduct.htm.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Guidance for responsible agricultural supply chains. 2018. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264251052-en.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. 2016. Available in: http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264252479-en.

O’ROURKE, D. Multi-stakeholder regulation: privatizing or socializing global labor standards? World Development, v. 34, n. 5, p. 899-907, 2006.

PARIOTTI, E. International soft law, human rights and non-state actors: towards the accountability of transnational corporations? Hum Rights, v. 10, p.139–155, 2009.

PARKER, C. The open corporation: effective self-regulation and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

RATNER, S. Corporations and human rights: a theory of legal responsibility. Yale Law Journal, v. 111, 2001-2002.

REINECKE, J.; DONAGHEY, J. The ‘Accord for Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh”’in response to the Rana Plaza disaster. In: MARX, A. et. al. (Ed.). Global governance of labour rights: assessing the effectiveness of transnational public and private policy initiatives. New York: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.

RUGGIE, J. The UN “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework for business and human rights. 2010. Available in: http://198.170.85.29/Ruggie-protect-respect-remedy-framework.pdf.

SARFATY, G. Shining a light on global supply chains. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 56, n. 2, p.419-463, 2015.

SHIFT. Respecting human rights through global supply chains shift workshop report n. 2. 2012. Available in: https:// www.shiftproject.org/media/resources/docs/Shift_ UNGPssupplychain2012.pdf.

SOBCZAK, A. Are codes of conduct in global supply chains really voluntary: from soft law regulation of labour relations to consumer law. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 16, n. 2, p. 167-184, 2006.

SOCIAAL-ECONOMISCHE RAAD. Dutch Banking sector agreement on international responsible business conduct regarding human rights. 2016. Available in: https:// www.ser.nl/~/media/files/internet/publicaties/overige/2010_2019/2016/dutch-banking-sector-agreement. ashx.

STEVELMAN, F. Global finance, multinationals and human rights: with commentary on backer’s critique of the 2008 report by John Ruggie. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, v. 9, n. 1, p. 101-145, 2011.

TURNER, R. J. Transnational supply chain regulation: extraterritorial regulation as corporate law’s new frontier. Melbourne Journal of International Law, v. 17, n. 1, p.188-209, 2016.

UTTING, P. Rethinking business regulation: from self-regulation to social control. 2005. Available in: http:// www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/document.nsf/462fc2 7bd1fce00880256b4a0060d2af/f02ac3db0ed406e0c12 570a10029bec8/$FILE/utting.pdf.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v15i2.5355

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia