The United Nation data governance: a panopticon and a catalyst for cooperation

Varda Mone, CLV Sivakumar

Abstract


With the rapid advancement of technology and digitalization, the collection, String, processing through machine learning and deep learning, trading of data has become widespread. However, because data privacy laws vary greatly from one jurisdiction to the next, personal information is not consistently secured. For people, corporations, and governments, this lack of harmonization creates challenges in a world that is ever more interconnected. This study looks into the viability of establishing a global data privacy body, specifically as a UN agency. By serving as the global regulatory authority for data privacy, a global data privacy organization can aid in the resolution of these issues. We examine some of these institution's possible benefits in this study, including enhanced privacy protection, safer data storage, and easier international data transfers. Additionally, it covers the obstacles that can develop when establishing an international organization and provides answers to those issues. By utilizing the expertise and resources of the United Nations, an international data privacy body can assist in making sure that data protection rules remain current with technological advancements. Additionally, it can contribute to increasing transparency and accountability in the digital economy, which is advantageous for both governments and enterprises.
To further the International Data Governance, establishment of a UN agency to address data privacy, cross border data transfer and global data governance issues is speculative from history, as happened in the development of IPR as important field in International Law WIPO was established. The adoption of a brand-new, comprehensive international data privacy policy is not required to happen (at least not right away) when a global organization is established. By harnessing the knowledge and resources of the United Nations, an international data privacy agency can ensure that data protection laws keep up with technological advancements and foster trust and responsibility in the digital ecosystem. The challenges brought on by the Collection, processing, analysis and transfer of stored data in different geographical locations, gives call for Data Globalization & Data Sovereignty Debate, therefore by establishing an institution by United Nations dedicated to promoting data privacy & related issues will act as a panopticon for State & Non-State actors.

Keywords


Data Protection, International Law, Data Privacy, United Nations; Data Governance; Third-World Perspective.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Posner, R.A., 1977. The Right of Privacy'12 Georgia Law Review 393.

Hiselius, P. 2010. ICT/Internet and the Right to Privacy. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 56, 201-208.

Gavison R, 1980. Privacy and the Limits of Law’ 89 The Yale Law Journal 421.

Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. 4 HARV. L. REV. 193.

Kinfe Yilma. 2023. Privacy and the Role of International Law in the Digital Age. Oxford University Press.

Solove DJ. 2002. Conceptualizing Privacy. 90 California Law Review 1094

Elif Kiesow Cortez. 2020. Data Protection Around the World. Privacy Laws in Action, Springer Nature.

Bygrave, L. A. 2010. Privacy and Data Protection in an International Perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 56, 165-200.

Aylward, S. 2013. The idea of privacy law: Jones v. Tsige and the limits of the common law. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, 71(1), 61-4.

Data warehouse, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_warehouse

Tanck, D. (2018). International law, indicators and global governance. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 10(1), 196-212.

General Data Protection Regulation - Regulation 2016/679

California Consumer Privacy Act, 2018, https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados, 2018. https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/lgpd

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, 2000

Syed Ahmed. The Importance of Data Governance. https://unite.un.org/blog/the-importance-of-data-governance

Bernier, A., Molnar-Gabor, F., & Knoppers, B. 2022. The international data governance landscape. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(1), 1-45.

United Nations Development Group. Data Privacy, Ethics and Protection Guidance Note on Big Data for Achievement of the 2030 Agenda. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/UNDG_BigData_final_web.pdf

General Data Protection Regulation - Regulation 2016/679

General Data Protection Regulation - Regulation 2016/679

Syed Ahmed. The Importance of Data Governance. https://unite.un.org/blog/the-importance-of-data-governance

Arner, D. W., Castellano, G. G., & Selga, E. K. The transnational data governance problem. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 37(2), 623-700. 2022.

Fishman, W. L., & Donaghue, H. Some Policy and Legal Issues in Transborder Data Flow. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 74, 179–188. 1980.

UNCTAD, Data Protection and Privacy Legislation Worldwide

Patrick, P. H. 1981. Privacy Restrictions on Transnational Data Flows: A Comparison of The Council of Europe Draft Convention and OECD Guidelines. Jurimetrics, 21(4), 405–420.

Kirby, M. 2009. The history, achievement and future of the 1980 OECD guidelines on privacy. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 20(2), 1-14.

Fromholz, J. M. 2000. The European Union Data Privacy Directive. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 15(1), 461–484.

Bing, J. 1984. The Council of Europe Convention and OECD Guidelines on Data Protection. Michigan Yearbook of International Legal Studies, 5, 271-304.

United Nations, “A Study of Guidelines Relating to the Use of Computerized Personal Files” https://cdn.un.org/unyearbook/yun/chapter_pdf/1989YUN/1989_P3_CH10.pdf

Solove, D. J., & Hartzog, W. 2014. The FTC and the new common law of privacy. Columbia Law Review, 114(3), 583-676.

Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. 1998. Constitution Of Democratic Experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267-473.

Fay, R., & Centre for International Governance Innovation. 2019. Digital Platforms Require a Global Governance Framework. In Models for Platform Governance (pp. 27–31). Centre for International Governance Innovation.

https://www.endpointprotector.com/blog/data-protection-legislation-around-the-world/

Mayer-Schönberger, V. 2010. Beyond Privacy, Beyond Rights—Toward a “Systems” Theory of Information Governance. California Law Review, 98(6), 1853–1885.

Solove, D. J., & Hartzog, W. 2014. The ftc and the new common law of privacy. Columbia Law Review, 114(3), 583-676.

Kennedy, D. 1976. Form and substance in private law adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89(8), 1685-1778.

Shaffer, G. C., & Pollack, M. A. 2010. Hard vs. soft law: alternatives, complements, and antagonists in international governance. Minnesota Law Review, 94(3), 706-799.

Schwartz, P. M., & Solove, D. J. 2011. The PII problem: privacy and new concept of personally identifiable information. New York University Law Review, 86(6), 1814-1894.

Schwartz, P. M., & Solove, D. J. 2011. The PII problem: privacy and new concept of personally identifiable information. New York University Law Review, 86(6), 1814-1894.

Kennedy, D. 1976. Form and substance in private law adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89(8), 1685-1778.

Lawrence, C. 1987. The id, the ego, and equal protection: reckoning with unconscious racism. Stanford Law Review, 39(2), 317-388.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v20i2.9154

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia