The United Nation data governance: a panopticon and a catalyst for cooperation
Resumen
To further the International Data Governance, establishment of a UN agency to address data privacy, cross border data transfer and global data governance issues is speculative from history, as happened in the development of IPR as important field in International Law WIPO was established. The adoption of a brand-new, comprehensive international data privacy policy is not required to happen (at least not right away) when a global organization is established. By harnessing the knowledge and resources of the United Nations, an international data privacy agency can ensure that data protection laws keep up with technological advancements and foster trust and responsibility in the digital ecosystem. The challenges brought on by the Collection, processing, analysis and transfer of stored data in different geographical locations, gives call for Data Globalization & Data Sovereignty Debate, therefore by establishing an institution by United Nations dedicated to promoting data privacy & related issues will act as a panopticon for State & Non-State actors.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referencias
Posner, R.A., 1977. The Right of Privacy'12 Georgia Law Review 393.
Hiselius, P. 2010. ICT/Internet and the Right to Privacy. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 56, 201-208.
Gavison R, 1980. Privacy and the Limits of Law’ 89 The Yale Law Journal 421.
Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. 4 HARV. L. REV. 193.
Kinfe Yilma. 2023. Privacy and the Role of International Law in the Digital Age. Oxford University Press.
Solove DJ. 2002. Conceptualizing Privacy. 90 California Law Review 1094
Elif Kiesow Cortez. 2020. Data Protection Around the World. Privacy Laws in Action, Springer Nature.
Bygrave, L. A. 2010. Privacy and Data Protection in an International Perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 56, 165-200.
Aylward, S. 2013. The idea of privacy law: Jones v. Tsige and the limits of the common law. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, 71(1), 61-4.
Data warehouse, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_warehouse
Tanck, D. (2018). International law, indicators and global governance. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 10(1), 196-212.
General Data Protection Regulation - Regulation 2016/679
California Consumer Privacy Act, 2018, https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados, 2018. https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/lgpd
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, 2000
Syed Ahmed. The Importance of Data Governance. https://unite.un.org/blog/the-importance-of-data-governance
Bernier, A., Molnar-Gabor, F., & Knoppers, B. 2022. The international data governance landscape. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(1), 1-45.
United Nations Development Group. Data Privacy, Ethics and Protection Guidance Note on Big Data for Achievement of the 2030 Agenda. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/UNDG_BigData_final_web.pdf
General Data Protection Regulation - Regulation 2016/679
General Data Protection Regulation - Regulation 2016/679
Syed Ahmed. The Importance of Data Governance. https://unite.un.org/blog/the-importance-of-data-governance
Arner, D. W., Castellano, G. G., & Selga, E. K. The transnational data governance problem. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 37(2), 623-700. 2022.
Fishman, W. L., & Donaghue, H. Some Policy and Legal Issues in Transborder Data Flow. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 74, 179–188. 1980.
UNCTAD, Data Protection and Privacy Legislation Worldwide
Patrick, P. H. 1981. Privacy Restrictions on Transnational Data Flows: A Comparison of The Council of Europe Draft Convention and OECD Guidelines. Jurimetrics, 21(4), 405–420.
Kirby, M. 2009. The history, achievement and future of the 1980 OECD guidelines on privacy. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 20(2), 1-14.
Fromholz, J. M. 2000. The European Union Data Privacy Directive. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 15(1), 461–484.
Bing, J. 1984. The Council of Europe Convention and OECD Guidelines on Data Protection. Michigan Yearbook of International Legal Studies, 5, 271-304.
United Nations, “A Study of Guidelines Relating to the Use of Computerized Personal Files” https://cdn.un.org/unyearbook/yun/chapter_pdf/1989YUN/1989_P3_CH10.pdf
Solove, D. J., & Hartzog, W. 2014. The FTC and the new common law of privacy. Columbia Law Review, 114(3), 583-676.
Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. 1998. Constitution Of Democratic Experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267-473.
Fay, R., & Centre for International Governance Innovation. 2019. Digital Platforms Require a Global Governance Framework. In Models for Platform Governance (pp. 27–31). Centre for International Governance Innovation.
https://www.endpointprotector.com/blog/data-protection-legislation-around-the-world/
Mayer-Schönberger, V. 2010. Beyond Privacy, Beyond Rights—Toward a “Systems” Theory of Information Governance. California Law Review, 98(6), 1853–1885.
Solove, D. J., & Hartzog, W. 2014. The ftc and the new common law of privacy. Columbia Law Review, 114(3), 583-676.
Kennedy, D. 1976. Form and substance in private law adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89(8), 1685-1778.
Shaffer, G. C., & Pollack, M. A. 2010. Hard vs. soft law: alternatives, complements, and antagonists in international governance. Minnesota Law Review, 94(3), 706-799.
Schwartz, P. M., & Solove, D. J. 2011. The PII problem: privacy and new concept of personally identifiable information. New York University Law Review, 86(6), 1814-1894.
Schwartz, P. M., & Solove, D. J. 2011. The PII problem: privacy and new concept of personally identifiable information. New York University Law Review, 86(6), 1814-1894.
Kennedy, D. 1976. Form and substance in private law adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89(8), 1685-1778.
Lawrence, C. 1987. The id, the ego, and equal protection: reckoning with unconscious racism. Stanford Law Review, 39(2), 317-388.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v20i2.9154
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)