Ecolabelling, eficiência energética e a disciplina dos PPM’s na OMC: ecolabels de eficiência energética e sua consistência com as provisões do GATT e Acordo TBT
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ANDRADE, Mariana Clara de. Métodos e processos produtivos (PPMS) ambientais e a organização mundial do comércio: análise sob a perspectiva da não-discriminação no comércio internacional. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Internacional, v. 16, 2015. Disponível em: www.cedin.com.br/revistaeletrônica.
BARTELS, Lorand. Article XX of GATT and the problem of extraterritorial jurisdiction: the case of trade measures for the protection of human rights. Journal of World Trade, v. 36, n. 2, p. 353–403, 2002.
BJORNER et al. Environmental labelling and consumers’ choice: an empirical analysis of the effect of the nordic swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Amsterdam, 2004.
BOSTRÖM, Magnus; KLINTMAN, Mikael. Eco-Standards, Product Labelling and Green Consumerism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
CHARNOVITZ, Steve. The Law of Environmental ‘PPMs’ in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality. Yale Journal of International Law, New Haven, v. 59, 2002. Available in: http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1451&context=faculty_publications.
CONRAD, Christiane R. Processes and production methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: interfacing trade and social goals. Paperback edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
DEERE, Carolyn. Eco-labelling and Sustainable Fisheries: IUCN: The World Conservation Union and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Washington; Rome, 1999.
ECO MARK OFFICE. Market Survey 2002: survey of market share of eco mark certified stationary products. Japão: EMO, 2002.
Energy Foundation. Forum on implementing China’s 2010 20 percent energy efficiency targets. Hainan: China, 2006.
GERTZ, Renate. Eco-labelling: a case for deregulation? In: LAW, Probability and Risk. Oxford: Oxford Journals, 2005.
HASSLER, Rolf; MAHLMANN, Imke; SCHOENHEIT, Ingo. Assessing the success of the German ecolabel. In: INSTITUTE REPORT. Hannover: IMUG, 1998.
HORN, Henrik; MAVROIDIS, Petros C. Economic and legal aspects of the most-favored-nation clause. European Journal Of Political Economy, Neuchatel, v. 17, n. 1, p.233-279, out. 2001.
HOWSE, Robert; REGAN, Donald. The product/process distinction: an illusory basis for disciplining “unilateralism” in trade policy. European Journal of International Law, v. 11, n. 2, p. 249–289, 2000.
JORDAN, Andrew; WURZEL, Rüdiger; ZITO, Anthony. New instruments of environmental governance: national experiences and prospects. Environmental Politics, n. 12, p. 1-24.
KOREAN ENVIRONMENT LABELLING ASSOCIATION. Social costs and benefits of ecolabelling. Seoul: KELA, 2004.
MAVROIDIS, Peter. Driftin too far from shore: why the test for compliance with the TBT agreement developed by the WTO Appellate Body is wrong, and what should the AB have done instead. World Trade Review, v. 12, n. 12, p. 509-531, jul. 2013.
MÜLLER, Edda. Environmental labelling, innovation and the toolbox of environmental policy: lessons learned from the German blue angel program. Alemanha: Federal Environment Ministry, 2002.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Processes and Production Methods (PPMs): conceptual framework and considerations on use of ppm-based trade measures. 1997. Available in: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/ ?cote=OCDE/GD(97)137&docLanguage=Em. Access in: 5 nov. 2015.
OKUBO, Atsuko. Environmental Labelling Programs and the WTO/GATT Regime. Georgetown International Law Review, v. 11, p. 603, 1999.
PRODUCT certification and ecolabelling for fisheries sustainability. In: FISHERIES TECHNICAL PAPER, 422. New York: FAO, 2001.
TIBOR, Tom; FELDMAN, Ira. ISO 14000: a guide to the new environmental management standards. Chicago: Irwin Professional Pub, 1996.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Solução de controvérsias. Genebra, 2003. Disponível em: http://unctad.org/pt/docs/edmmisc232add33_pt.pdf.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY. Energy star: the power to protect the environment through energy efficiency. Washington: USEPA, 2003.
WINTER, Gerd. The GATT and environmental protection: problems of construction. Journal of Environmental Law, p. 113–40, 2003.
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Economic Research and Statistics Division: international standards and the WTO TBT agreement: improving governance for regulatory alignment. Genebra: WTO, 2013.
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Decisions and recommendations adopted by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade since 1 January 1995. (11-2857), G/ TBT/1/Rev.10. 2011c.
ZARRILLI, Simonetta; JHA, Veena; VOSSENAAR, Rene. Eco-Labelling and international trade. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997.
ZHOU, Nan; LEVINE, Mark D.; PRICE, Lynn. Overview of current energy efficiency policies in China. Energy Policy Review, Melbourne, v. 38, 2010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v13i2.3971
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)